New research clarifies how we understand metaphors—like “grasping” an idea—and how that process is rooted in our bodily experience.
Some functional MRI, or fMRI, brain imaging studies have indicated, for example, that when you hear a metaphor such as “she had a rough day,” regions of the brain associated with tactile experience activate. If you hear, “he’s so sweet,” areas associated with taste activate. And when you hear action verbs used in a metaphorical context, like “grasp a concept,” regions involved in motor perception and planning activate.
On average, we use a metaphor every 20 words.
The new study in the journal builds on this research by looking at when, exactly, different regions of the brain activate in metaphor comprehension and what that tells us about the way we understand language.
Bend the rod/bend the rules
Researchers have found that on average, people use a metaphor every 20 words, says Vicky Lai, an assistant professor of psychology and cognitive science at the University of Arizona. As director of the Cognitive Neuroscience of Language Laboratory in the psychology department, Lai is interested in how the brain processes metaphors and other types of language.
“…language comprehension is fast—at the rate of 4 words per second.”
Her latest study used EEG, or brainwave studies, to record electrical patterns in the brain when participants encountered metaphors containing action content, like “grasp the idea” or “bend the rules.”
Study participants saw three different sentences on a computer screen—one word at a time. One sentence described a concrete action, such as, “The bodyguard bent the rod.” Another was a metaphor using the same verb: “The church bent the rules.” In the third sentence, the verb was replaced with a more abstract word that conveyed the same meaning as the metaphor: “The church altered the rules.”
When participants saw the word “bent” used in both the literal and metaphorical context, it evoked a similar response in the brain, with the sensory-motor region being activated almost immediately—within 200 milliseconds—of the verb appearing on the screen. That response differed when “altered” replaced “bent.”
Quick thinking
Lai’s work supports previous findings from fMRI studies, which measure brain activity changes related to blood flow; however, the EEG, which measures electrical activity in the brain, provides a clearer picture of just how important the sensory motor regions of the brain may be for metaphor comprehension.
“In an fMRI, it takes time for oxygenation and deoxygenation of blood to reflect change caused by the language that was just uttered,” Lai says. “But language comprehension is fast—at the rate of four words per second.”
Therefore, with an fMRI, it’s hard to tell whether the sensory motor region is truly necessary for understanding action-based metaphors or if it’s something that’s activated after comprehension has already taken place. The EEG provides a much more precise sense of timing.
“By using the brainwave measure, we tease apart the time course of what happens first,” Lai says.
In the study, the near-immediate activation of the sensory motor region after the verb was displayed suggests that region of the brain is indeed quite important in comprehension.
Lai’s current research extends understanding of how humans comprehend language and will help foundationally with some of the other questions her lab is exploring, such as: Can metaphoric language be used to improve people’s moods? What role might language play in healthy aging? And, can metaphors aid in the learning of abstract concepts? Lai recently on the use of metaphors to aid in the teaching, learning, and retention of science concepts at the annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society in San Francisco.
“Understanding how the brain approaches the complexity of language allows us to begin to test how complex language impacts other aspects of cognition,” she says.
Source:
